| Author |
Thread Statistics | Show CCP posts - 6 post(s) |
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
168
   |
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:43:39 -
[1] - Quote
Xenuria wrote:I support this.
you want to be on csm cause you felt hats are more important
I don't support you or this sov change.
|
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
169
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 17:50:57 -
[2] - Quote
CCP in all their might.. still never even mentions on how they will deal with AFK CLOAKY CAMPING in null sec
as I previously mentioned "we'll all end up AFK CLOAKING left and right"
therefore with this plan.
A- Cloaky Camper begins camping a system.. dropping its indexes allowing for easy take over with frigate fleets
this is what CCP wants and calls it active gameplay
thanks for the direction to another game and company ill spend with them instead of you ccp..
congrats on losing money
|
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
169
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 18:55:32 -
[3] - Quote
virm pasuul wrote:In all this fuss don't forget that destructible player built stargates are coming at some time.
The fanfest is 2 weeks away, there may be stuff in there that ties in to these changes.........
I believe that's going to be only in "NEW SPACE" not the current regions of null sec.. so umm yeah good luck with that wish.
but what about the "idea" of Destructible Outpost/stations in null sec.. i'll wait and laugh at the threadnaught on that topic. |
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
171
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 22:18:42 -
[4] - Quote
and so begins the subbing of accounts.. month to month screw paying you guys months upfront.. EVER AGAIN.
take your plex and stick it. |
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
171
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 22:20:34 -
[5] - Quote
Anthar Thebess wrote:So again big guys are getting head start before every thing starts. CCP can we get something earlier? Like removing some of the timers? Let us put eve on fire a bit earlier Pretty please  Quote:Alliance:Northern Associates. From:MissMary Thornbush Sent:2015-03-03 21:16:00 http://community.eveonline.com/news/dev-blogs/politics-by-other-means/
So with sov changes comeing N3 will be makeing plans to adjsut how we do things - Now before everyone has a hart attack the patch isnt till June but we have to make adjustments prior too. With this said somethings you need to be prepaird to do. 1. If you are a CAP BUILDER all building needs to stop no lator then march 30th this means finished done nothing more going into build till after we send you a update when this can be done. why- there will be some re adjusting of space and you may or may not be able to build where you currently are and or sov will change to a new alliance as we re orgnize. 2. Some renters will be asked to relocate to new rental alliances as they are formed as we re work how this is done. Atmo you have no need to stress your renter managers for your regions will contact you when and if you are effected how ever the most important part is being ready for adjustments anyone who puts a build in after this mail is fked if we decide your region is being transferd to a new alliance. So do not do it !!! Lady
CSM did their work they're excellent puppets. what are you talking about!.. don't like it then VOTE THEM OUT! |
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
171
|
Posted - 2015.03.03 22:56:47 -
[6] - Quote
Altirius Saldiaro wrote:Milla Goodpussy wrote:and so begins the subbing of accounts.. month to month screw paying you guys months upfront.. EVER AGAIN.
take your plex and stick it. Why dont you like the changes?
cause ccp cant even figure out why folks play this game. look at it's history they fail at player retention. it may be harsh and its true. a lot of us right now are pissed off to the fullest. we have cap pilots now sitting in huge paperweights (haha bet you wish you could dock now right).. yet ccp cant understand why folks refuse to pay alittle longer..
plus I am sick of those surveys they send out, its pretty blatant they don't pay attention to it..just like feedback threads.. oops did I say that.. no fawks given.
this whole change would be better suited for Low-Sec and not Null-sec cause its understandable the scope of fixing null is so difficult that they CCP do not want to spend any further time dealing with it.
now i'll wait and give them pennies instead of full dollars just incase they cant figure out why im no longer biting at their carrot they love to dangle. |
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
172
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 03:29:17 -
[7] - Quote
how come this SOV Change doesn't even mention the change or supposed changed for moons.. its like he's purposely protecting interest in this area..
and no Im never taking my tinfoil hat off..
wassup wit dat! |
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
174
|
Posted - 2015.03.04 05:07:51 -
[8] - Quote
Cr Turist wrote:Karbowiak wrote:EvilweaselFinance wrote:Karbowiak wrote:Am i the only one wishing that we'd get the old pos warfare sov system back?  no, i liked that and it was significantly better in a lot of ways than this or dominion it was completely broken by AOE doomsdays protecting cynojammers, but that's gotten fixed, and fuel blocks exist now True story. Plus with the POS system, you could take a system in about a day, instead of spending a week taking on system. Yes you had to steamroll a system with lots of dreads, but compared to the current system, or the proposed one, you atleast had a light at the end of the tunnel. Meh, whatever.. i never ever thought i would say this but i agree. bring back the whole pos system or something like it. i mean people complain about grinding but it leads to hot drops, fights, and bitter old vets (anyone who was around during the pos sov years knows what i mean) but i doubt it matters since CCP has already stopped reading this thread as can be noticed by the lack of dev feedback or of answering any questions.
lol you honestly think fozzie was going to communicate on this epic thread right now?? you remember when greyscale tried it and was countered left and right.. he left the building claiming he was sick...(and went home to hide in his cave) |
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
175
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 08:46:24 -
[9] - Quote
Gorgof Intake wrote:Everyone just needs to chill and wait out for more info on the actual fitting requirements and adjustments that will inevitably be made to this.
Stop splurging on like autistic children. Sheesh. Decent observations are getting lost in the absolute drivel you people have spewed forth about trollceptor fleets, CFC posturing and ~the end of supercaptials~.
Guys, its still months away from implementation and there WILL be adjustments. Just chill. Its not the end of the world. Its a good step in the right direction and with a bit (a lot?) of spit and polish this will be a marked improvement on the current status quo of sitting on a titan and gaining perfect intel over the enemy before standing down for yet another blueball OP.
Relax people. Relax.
coming from someone who's group was main reason jump fatigue was created.
you'd be crying a tear of hell if they nerfed hot dropping all together.
yeah I said it so what.. you gonna drop a nyx on my miner ship........again!
|
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
176
|
Posted - 2015.03.05 16:40:11 -
[10] - Quote
Abrazzar wrote:125 pages, 2 CSM posts. This shows how little your vote matters. If it had to be any more obvious.
100's near thousands of post about afk cloaky camping, and ccp refuses to acknowledge that its a problem, fozzie comes up with this sov change and cloaky camping is going to go up but I promise you this.
they'll provide a pretty pie chart saying it isn't so.
csm is nothing but puppets and a gimmick for elite ego's that want to play with it, nothing else, he gives them the insider news and they only protect their interest.. they are not for protecting anyone else.
|
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
180
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 20:01:20 -
[11] - Quote
Mike Azariah wrote:https://soundcloud.com/eve-down-under/eve-down-under-episode-97-060315 is the link of Fozzie being interviewed on Eve Down Under. You may want to skip the first 5 min of introductions.
He addresses interceptors @ 11 minute mark
'If gameplay devolves into people orbiting at 250 km . . . then we would make sure that that doesn't happen"
Prime Time window will be the first 'breakout thread.
Look, go listen for yourself . . . or wait for the next thread. Greygal voiced a good idea of linking prime window to the indices of the alliance. One that is not active would see their window widen, making them more vulnerable.
m
he'll ignore it just like he's ignored cloaky camping which also has an impact on system indexes.. he's just trying to keep heat off his behind.. he's lying his behind off..
gameplay has became cloaky afk camping and nothing has been done about it. he pretends there isn't an issue, but if there's hundreds of threads about it.. why not someone from ccp deal with it..
oh that's right .. AFK CLOAKY CAMPING is active gameplay....psssssssssssssssht |
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
181
|
Posted - 2015.03.06 23:00:11 -
[12] - Quote
[
According to various noises from CCP, missions are on the (eventual) chopping block.
You'll have no argument from me about the absurdity of the coward Atron/billionaire SB problem.[/quote]
if that has any truth to then why are they working on cruiser burner missions.. just stop already and please stick to topic.
|
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
181
|
Posted - 2015.03.07 00:36:16 -
[13] - Quote
epicurus ataraxia wrote:Milla Goodpussy wrote:Mike Azariah wrote:https://soundcloud.com/eve-down-under/eve-down-under-episode-97-060315 is the link of Fozzie being interviewed on Eve Down Under. You may want to skip the first 5 min of introductions.
He addresses interceptors @ 11 minute mark
'If gameplay devolves into people orbiting at 250 km . . . then we would make sure that that doesn't happen"
Prime Time window will be the first 'breakout thread.
Look, go listen for yourself . . . or wait for the next thread. Greygal voiced a good idea of linking prime window to the indices of the alliance. One that is not active would see their window widen, making them more vulnerable.
m he'll ignore it just like he's ignored cloaky camping which also has an impact on system indexes.. he's just trying to keep heat off his behind.. he's lying his behind off.. gameplay has became cloaky afk camping and nothing has been done about it. he pretends there isn't an issue, but if there's hundreds of threads about it.. why not someone from ccp deal with it.. oh that's right .. AFK CLOAKY CAMPING is active gameplay....psssssssssssssssht You may not get the answer you expect, if seeing a cloaky camper in system makes you worry , he may just remove what it is that makes you worry.
then I highly doubt he removes himself from eve online then if he did.. then id really celebrate. |
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
182
|
Posted - 2015.03.09 21:58:21 -
[14] - Quote
Senzite wrote:All i see is a whole lot of hate coming from CCP.
CCP has made it their mission to flame hate null each passing year that goes by and its members in all the various alliances who call this space home.
So give us one that lives up to the reputation that EVE use to command.
great comment, but fozzie has had a reputation for hating indy and everything that went along with it, hence his wicked ideas on it, he wants pew pew which is his main playstyle anything else is to carebear for him to even bear. you can see this is their incredible lack of work ethic towards indy in the first place.
still no fix for the rorqual, still no plan for fixing indy due to removal of teams, no mention of that what so ever.. see my point? this guy seems to want to rip eve to shreds before he departs somewhere else just like the others have done in the past. and SHE is allowing it cause they came up with "a dev can pick and choose what he wants to work on this is a great idea!.. not!"
I cant wait for the competition to begin showing up and watching the many "small time" players leave for that game.. see you all there soon and guess what.. it's going to be a blast seeing how ccp begins the "please stay with us campaign".
watch, wait, and see. |
Milla Goodpussy
Federal Navy Academy
183
|
Posted - 2015.03.11 02:15:37 -
[15] - Quote
Querns wrote:Xpaulusx wrote:I can see new subscriptions soaring under these conditions............Oh wait.  Confirming that new players subscribe to run L4 missions and highsec incursions.
but but but.. ccp is removing missions since they said to someone who said to another but but but...oh wait
fozzie should nerf incursion income
fozzie should nerf missions........oh wait he did
fozzie should nerf research agents........oh wait he did
fozzie should nerf himself.................i'll wait. |
| |
|